| Highlighted Cases |
The attorneys at Eckland & Blando have handled numerous high-profile cases across the country. Both at the trial and appellate level, and all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, we have fought hard against the government to enforce our clients' rights.
Significant matters in which our attorneys have acted as counsel include the following published decisions. Additional cases are listed in each attorney's Full C.V. on the Lawyer Profiles pages. Breach of Contract
UFE Inc. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., U.S. District Court (Doty), Civ. No. 4-90-103, Minneapolis, Minnesota (1992). Jury special verdict finding damages of $436,000 in breach of contract action involving airbag production for Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler automobiles Eckland & Blando successfully defended two individual employees and their private company-employer (and follow-on government contractor) against various state law claims including breach of contract and covenant not to compete claims on the grounds that the plaintiff’s own predecessor government contract precluded said claims against the defendants. Click here to read the Court's decision. This decision has been reversed in a 2-1 decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals and further proceedings are pending in the District Court. Click here to read the decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals.
Chancellor Manor v. United States, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Washington, D.C. (2003); 331 F.3d 891 (Fed. Cir. 2003). Rejecting government's attempts to avoid liability for Fifth Amendment takings of properties owned by government contractor affordable housing owners. On Remand, 67 Fed. Cl. 434 (2005), awarding over $15 million in damages to plaintiffs
United Power Association v. FEMA, U.S. District Court (Webb), Case No. A2-99-180, Fargo, North Dakota (2001); 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12922 (D.N.D. 2001). Denying government's motion to dismiss and allowing jury trial of damages claim against FEMA for denial of equal protection in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution Technical Ordnance, Inc. v. Moore, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, St. Paul, Minnesota (2001); 214 F.3d 641 (2001). Reversal of trial court's finding that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment in favor of defendants, including a federal agent in a Bivens action for wrongful prosecution in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the United States for claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
Allstate Financial Corporation v. United States, U.S. District Court (Renner), Civil Action No. 4-93-959, St. Paul, Minnesota (1995), aff'd, 109 F.3d 1331 (8th Cir. 1997). Affirming final judgment plus interest in the amount of $1.5 Million for wrongful IRS seizure of government contract proceeds
Appeal of Technical Ordnance, Inc., ASBCA No. 38142, 93-3 BCA ¶ 26,089. Conversion of default termination (T/D) to termination for convenience (T/C) of a MK Stabilizer contract for Navy torpedoes
Appeals of TMI Coatings, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 46682, 46871, 94-2 BCA ¶ 26,954. Award for latent defects in jet fuel tanks at the U.S. Naval Air Station, Bermuda Appeals of McNally Industries, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 43027, 44688, 93-3 BCA ¶ 26,130. Award for Army machine gun defective technical data package
In re Control Corporation, B-253410.3, July 5, 1995, 95-2 CPD ¶ 127. Protest of contract award to Control Data Systems, Inc. for the maintenance of computers at the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) at Point Mugu, California In re Multi-Bloc, Inc., B-259182.2, April 20, 1995, 95-1 CPD ¶ 217. Award of fees and costs in protest of contract award for a firing range at the Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota
In re Baxter-Travenol. Protest by national medical products company of a $1 million contract awarded by the Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) to Baxter-Travenol, based upon alleged violations of Minnesota's Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, resulting in resolicitation of contract
Appeals of Alliant Techsystems, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 47626, 51280, 00-2 BCA ¶ 31,042. Finding Alliant Techsystems not liable for defective pricing of a "Black Ops" contract for a Persian Gulf War weapons system under the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA), thereby avoiding $1.5 Million in excess costs and interest
Gronholz v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., U.S. District Court (Davis), Civil Action No. 3-94-1239, St. Paul, Minnesota (1996). Special jury verdict finding no infringement and awarding $0 in damages in patent infringement action (Craftsman power tool) where plaintiff sought $3.2 Million in damages Jurgens v. CBK, Ltd., U.S. District Court (Todd), Civ. No. 89-1140, Jackson, Tennessee (1994), aff'd, 80 F.3d 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Remanding jury findings in favor of clients/plaintiffs for damages and willful patent infringement for application of proper application of damage multiplier. On Remand, case settled for $1.3 Million
Territorial Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 54 Fed. Appx. 339; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23392 (3d Cir. 2002) Pine Bluff for Safe Disposal, et al. v. Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission, et. al., 354 Ark. 536, 127 S.W. 2d 509 (2003)
Eastover Ridge, LLC v. Metric Constructors, Inc., 533 S.E.2d 827 (N.C. App. 2000). Affirming dismissal of claims brought by owner of apartment complex against general contractor Appeal of Thomas & Sons Builders, Inc., ASBCA No. 43527. 95-1 BCA ¶ 27,336 and 96-1 BCA ¶ 28,101 |
E&B Alert 5.26.2011Supreme Court Issues Opinion Regarding GovernmentContracts and State Secrets This week, the Supre... [ More ] |
E&B Alert 5.20.2011GAO Orders Reimbursement of Contractors' Costs and Fees in Meritorious Bid Protests This week... [ More ] |